¿°Ä¡ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ÀÌ·¸°Ô ¿Ã·Á¿ä.. °úÁ¦·Î ÇÑ ´Ü¿øÀ» Çؼ®ÇØ¾ß Çϴµ¥ ¸ð°¡ ÀÌ·¸°Ô ¾î·Á¿îÁö..
´Ù Çسõ°í ¾ÈµÇ´Â ºÎºÐ¸¸ »©³ù´Âµ¥ ºÁµµºÁµµ ¾ÈµÇ³×¿ä.. Çؼ®µÈ ºÎºÐµµ Àִµ¥ È®½ÇÇÑÁö ¸ô¶ó¼..
¿µ¾î¿¡ ´ÉÅëÇÑ ºÐµé Á¦¹ß µµ¿ÍÁÖ¼¼¿ä.. ^^;
Quotes and borrowed ideas from Plato, Aristotle, Longinus, and other classical writers pepper his criticism.
Aristotle`s Poetics, for example, Arnold adapts his idea that the best poetry is of a "higher trurh and seriousness" than history, of any other human subject of activity, for that matter.
He notes, "More and more [human]kind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us.
for the critic will be able to pave the way for high culture--a prerequisite for the poet and the writing of the best poetry.
Whose judgments, for example, shall we follow? Shall lines written by Homer and Dante be considered excellent? How about Sidney`s or even Aristophanes`?
By taking Wordsworth`s concept of the poet one step further, Arnold separated both the critic and the poet from society in order to create a type of poetry and criticism that could supposedly rescue society from its baser elements and preserve its most noble characteristics. |
|